Latest
Fund 1 bids to take Xponential private at up to $7 a share/Fund 1 bids to take Xponential private at up to $7 a share/Fund 1 bids to take Xponential private at up to $7 a share/Fund 1 bids to take Xponential private at up to $7 a share/
← Brands
Acquisition · Nov 3, 2026 · 5 min read

Xponential Got a Buyout Offer at Up to $7 a Share. The Stock Was at $3.74.

Fund 1 Investments wants every share, and says a private Xponential could rebuild studio demand. The premium tells you what public markets think franchise studio equity is worth.

Alice covers growth, retention and technology for fitness and wellness operators at The Run Rate.

Black and white cut-out of a reformer machine against deep teal and cream collage blocks
Make The Run Rate one of your go-to sources on Google Add The Run Rate on Google
$7.00
Top of the cash offer per share
$3.74
Close the day before
$500M
Debt the company carries

Xponential Fitness got an offer to stop being a public company. Fund 1 Investments sent the board a letter on October 30 proposing to buy every outstanding share for cash.

The offer is $5.61 to $7.00 a share. The stock had closed at $3.74 the day before. Shares jumped around 17% once the news was out.

Nothing is agreed. There is no deal, and the board has not responded publicly. This is a proposal, disclosed in a Schedule 13D/A filing, with the letter itself attached as an exhibit.

What does a premium that size say about studio franchise value?

It says the public market had written the business down further than a buyer thinks it deserves. Paying at least 50% over the last close is a bet that the problem is the listing rather than the studios. Fund 1's letter argues a private Xponential could focus on rebuilding studio demand and its balance sheet without quarterly scrutiny. For franchisees and independents, the useful signal is that someone with capital thinks reformer and boutique demand is still there, and that the damage is financial.

The numbers in the filing

ItemFigure
Offer per share$5.61 to $7.00, cash
Close on October 29$3.74
Fund 1 stake in Class A sharesAbout 9.9%
Economic exposure including swapsAbout 19.9%
Debt on the balance sheetMore than $500 million

That gap between 9.9% and 19.9% is worth explaining. Fund 1 holds about half its position through a total return swap (a contract that pays out as if you owned the shares, without actually holding them). It gets the economics of a much bigger stake while its registered ownership stays under 10%. That is a common way to build influence quietly before going public with a bid.

Fund 1 also says it would want a waiver of the stockholder rights agreement the company put in place on October 12. A rights agreement makes it expensive for anyone to accumulate shares past a threshold. The fact that one was adopted three weeks ago, and that a bidder is already asking for it to be lifted, tells you this had been building.

Why the debt is the real story

More than $500 million of debt against a company the market valued at a fraction of that is the pressure behind all of it. Interest has to be paid whether studios are full or not. Franchise systems feel this at one remove: the brand's borrowing does not show up on a franchisee's own books, but it shapes every decision made above them. Marketing fund priorities, territory pricing, how hard head office pushes new openings.

We saw the operating picture underneath this in Xponential's Q2 numbers, where the studio count rose while revenue per studio fell. More locations, each one carrying less. A take-private does nothing to that arithmetic on its own.

So who actually pays for a deal like this?

Somebody has to service the purchase price. In a take-private the usual answer is the business, through cost discipline and whatever cash it can generate. For a franchisor, cash comes from royalties, from equipment and buildout margin, and from selling territories. Those are the levers a new owner can reach without touching a single class.

Fund 1 points to its earlier take-privates of L'Occitane and Tile Shop Holdings as evidence it can do this. Both are retail. Neither sold franchises to small operators who had put their own money at risk.

What this means for you

If you franchise with a listed brand, the ownership question is now a live one. Ask what a change of control would mean for your territory rights, your renewal terms, and your marketing fund contribution. Those answers are in your agreement, and they are easier to read before a deal than during one.

If you compete with Club Pilates, expect no quiet period. A bidder arguing it can rebuild studio demand is describing a company that intends to open and market harder, not retreat. The capital question is one Pilates brands have been solving through master franchising for a while, which lets them scale without putting up the money themselves.

And if you are weighing outside money for your own studios, note what the premium is really saying. Public markets priced this at $3.74. A buyer says it is worth up to $7.00 away from the spotlight. Both can be right at once, and the difference is who gets to be patient.

Frequently Asked Questions

Has Xponential agreed to be taken private?
No. Fund 1 Investments sent a non-binding letter to the board on October 30. There is no agreement and the board has not responded publicly, so this remains a proposal.
How much is Fund 1 offering for Xponential?
Between $5.61 and $7.00 a share in cash for all outstanding shares, at least 50% above the $3.74 close on October 29. Shares rose about 17% after the news.
What would a take-private mean for Club Pilates franchisees?
A change of control can affect territory rights, renewal terms and marketing fund contributions, all of which are governed by the franchise agreement. The company also carries more than $500 million in debt, which shapes decisions made above franchisee level.
More from The Run Rate